<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Google Public Policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.googlepublicpolicy.com/comments/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.googlepublicpolicy.com</link>
	<description>Helping Google to promote the word</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:53:59 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Taking the Wraps Off Google&#8217;s Public Policy Blog by David</title>
		<link>http://www.googlepublicpolicy.com/google-public-policy/taking-the-wraps-off-googles-public-policy-blog.html/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2007 02:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googlepublicpolicy.com/2007/06/taking-the-wraps-off-googles-public-policy-blog/#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I am glad for the comments section here. There seems to be something that Google doesn&#039;t understand about the blogging spirit--it&#039;s not supposed to be 100% one-way. When I heard sometime ago that Alan Davidson was going to head up a public policy office for Google in DC, it scared me. I understand how an idea like this could originate in the boardroom, but I am surprised the two founders let it materialize. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I am a big fan of Google&#039;s search engine, but their present vertical integration scheme and army of lobbyist, coupled with information available on the &quot;real&quot; Google culture (compliments of the book Search) makes we want to look elsewhere to search. Yahoo&#039;s search results are as good as Google&#039;s lately, and Ask seems to be improving considerably, especially in innovative interfaces. I am certainly not the first to say it, but it would seem that Google is quickly becoming the new Microsoft. It was fun while it lasted. BTW: the light gray text on light gray background makes it very difficult for me to type this comment, or maybe that&#039;s the whole idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am glad for the comments section here. There seems to be something that Google doesn&#8217;t understand about the blogging spirit&#8211;it&#8217;s not supposed to be 100% one-way. When I heard sometime ago that Alan Davidson was going to head up a public policy office for Google in DC, it scared me. I understand how an idea like this could originate in the boardroom, but I am surprised the two founders let it materialize. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I am a big fan of Google&#8217;s search engine, but their present vertical integration scheme and army of lobbyist, coupled with information available on the &#8220;real&#8221; Google culture (compliments of the book Search) makes we want to look elsewhere to search. Yahoo&#8217;s search results are as good as Google&#8217;s lately, and Ask seems to be improving considerably, especially in innovative interfaces. I am certainly not the first to say it, but it would seem that Google is quickly becoming the new Microsoft. It was fun while it lasted. BTW: the light gray text on light gray background makes it very difficult for me to type this comment, or maybe that&#8217;s the whole idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
